Talk:Nano 3G: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Audio-codec ?: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Audio-codec ? | Audio-codec ? | ||
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? | |||
The only references to this chip on the internets are on | |||
ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source. | |||
There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets | |||
to be found anywhere, etc etc .. | |||
Doesn't it make more business-sense that the nano 3G would use the same codec | |||
as the other ipod released in 2007 ('Classic')? | |||
== Audio-codec ? == | |||
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? | How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 30 October 2011
Audio-codec ?
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ?
The only references to this chip on the internets are on ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source.
There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets to be found anywhere, etc etc ..
Doesn't it make more business-sense that the nano 3G would use the same codec as the other ipod released in 2007 ('Classic')?
Audio-codec ?
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ?
The only references to this chip on the internets are on ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source.
There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets to be found anywhere, etc etc ..
Doesn't it make more business-sense that the nano 3G would use the same codec as the other ipod released in 2007 ('Classic')?