Difference between revisions of "Talk:Todo list"

From freemyipod.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(1G/2G/3G Classic HDD-layout)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'm pretty certain there is a HPA/DCO on those drives, and that ATA pw is set .
 
I'm pretty certain there is a HPA/DCO on those drives, and that ATA pw is set .
 +
:There definitely is no ATA password, and I don't know of an HPA. I'm not even sure if the CE-ATA drive supports HPAs. The hiding of the firmware partition is most likely done by the iPod firmware. --[[User:TheSeven|TheSeven]] 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
  
 
Also, when viewing the physical disk of my emCore'd Classic in win-hex (over USB) there
 
Also, when viewing the physical disk of my emCore'd Classic in win-hex (over USB) there
Line 8: Line 9:
 
and the technical report complains that " FAT1 < FAT2 " .
 
and the technical report complains that " FAT1 < FAT2 " .
 
But the disk needs to be connected to a proper controller for any accurate results ..
 
But the disk needs to be connected to a proper controller for any accurate results ..
 +
:emCORE/Rockbox is a proper controller for that kind of operation. And WinHEX has a lot of problems with non-512 byte sectors, causing it to miscalculate a bunch of sector numbers. --[[User:TheSeven|TheSeven]] 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
  
 
(Why the super-floppy formatting btw ?)
 
(Why the super-floppy formatting btw ?)
 
Robert
 
Robert
 +
:What would a partition table be good for? Superfloppy seems like the straight-forward choice to me. --[[User:TheSeven|TheSeven]] 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:04, 15 November 2011

1G/2G/3G Classic HDD-layout

I'm pretty certain there is a HPA/DCO on those drives, and that ATA pw is set .

There definitely is no ATA password, and I don't know of an HPA. I'm not even sure if the CE-ATA drive supports HPAs. The hiding of the firmware partition is most likely done by the iPod firmware. --TheSeven 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Also, when viewing the physical disk of my emCore'd Classic in win-hex (over USB) there is a 120MB entry,listed as "FAT1",

and the technical report complains that " FAT1 < FAT2 " . But the disk needs to be connected to a proper controller for any accurate results ..

emCORE/Rockbox is a proper controller for that kind of operation. And WinHEX has a lot of problems with non-512 byte sectors, causing it to miscalculate a bunch of sector numbers. --TheSeven 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

(Why the super-floppy formatting btw ?) Robert

What would a partition table be good for? Superfloppy seems like the straight-forward choice to me. --TheSeven 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)